
Each: $56.00
Capa: Ecuador
Capote: Dominican Republic
Tripa: Dominican Republic & Peru
La Fuerza: Medium
Forma: 7 1/2 x 50
First Half:
I am a firm believer in dry boxing cigars. If you are fortunate to live in a state with low humidity, you have it made in the shade. Florida can be a miserable place when the ever present humidity turns your cigars into a sea sponge. Therefore, dry boxing is the scheme of the century in which the smoker can get ahead of mother nature.
The cold draw takes only seconds. I retrohale the unlit cigar. Microscopic nodules of tobacco rest near my sinuses. The floral aroma is a delight.
I take my time as I torch the foot. It is ritualistic and calmative. A bright cherry is inviting and sociable. Within the first minute, the relaxation is put on hold as there is pungent sourness, strong black pepper, and rotten wood. I push the cigar away from my mouth as if it might want the chance to explain itself, and I observe a crack near the foot. If you arrive disheveled for roll call, you will find yourself on an unlevel playing field. Therefore, you arrive rakish and snappy. The Zino is docked for disorderly conduct.
The first two inches are self-defeating. The cigar requires several attempts to keep the ember front and center. You expect a protocol of refinement from a Davidoff cigar. The poor construction was given a questionable safe harbor as expectations were high for the manufacturer’s stated flavor menu. There is no hint of dark chocolate. What might be described as cinnamon is merely sharp unpleasantness.
Early Summary: In a herf environment where I might be asked how I was enjoying this cigar there would be a flurry of epithets.
2 1/2 inches and the slightest complex notes are set in motion to offset the disagreeable initial welcome. The black pepper relaxes and the unrelenting sourness becomes even more noticeable. This is my third Zino over a 5 day period. Unfortunately, I am having the same reaction provided by cigar #1 and cigar #2. I had the same construction issues with the prior cigars.
The retrohale doesn’t help. It provides a bland accent to a failing cigar.
We must admit that as smokers, we find self-control is something for the other guy to observe. We get new cigars. We lovingly unbox the treasure chest. Our eyes are like saucers. We sniff. We fondle. We tell ourselves we will wait and let them age. A couple days later, we are lighting one up just to see. At the halfway point, we begin to curse and wail to the heavens what idiots we are. I’ve never pulled the trigger in this haphazard manner with a $50 cigar. It is the $11 sticks that bare witness to a premature demise.
The cigar needs a boost of creaminess to offset the intense spiciness. But Davidoff declares this is a woody smoke. It’s a cover up. At the 3 1/2 inch mark, the acidity is overwhelming. Any cigar at this price point must strike immediately with positive notes. Its solitary attempt for immortality might be with the redemption of serious aging. I have one cigar left and it will not be touched before astronauts set foot on the moon.
First Half Summary: Despite this cigar being given several months of aging, it clearly had no upbeat impact. Please note that I’m being generous while giving Davidoff the benefit of serious doubt.
While I’m not willing to indict this cigar as an unfunny joke, the first half comes and goes and doesn’t leverage my palate in a flattering way,
Second Half Summary: Leaves preserved in the form of an expensive fungible token need to inform the palate rather than deceive it. The cigar is motionless. If the esteemed reviewers who blind taste test cigars were to appraise this blend, they would discover utter disappointment. No sightless smoker could possibly guess this is a $56 Davidoff.
During the last 3 inches of the cigar, its tartness scatters to the four winds. This writer is relieved. Yet the lack of terribleness does not make for an enjoyable cigar. It merely allows me to polish off this tour de force without a disturbing facial manifestation.
Few smokers want to take the chance that a $56.00 cigar will find a gilded outcome at some point in the future. I can afford this cigar, but I wouldn’t dare recommend it to my friends who see the world as their oyster.
Scoring System 1-100 averaged and rounded up as follows:
Appearance: 85
Construction: 88
Aroma, Draw, & Burn: 85
Complexity: 60
Balance: 50
Final Score: 74
An Introduction:
I first met the Katman in 2006. I was visiting relatives in Chicago. Phil had not yet become the cigar bon vivant we’ve all come to love, but we shared a passion for good cigars. We became fast friends over these last 18 years. He joyfully shared his wealth of knowledge with me. I will try to follow his lead in providing entertaining cigar reviews.
I’ve been a cigar smoker for 19 years. I reside in Florida. I am descended from immigrants from Cuba. I am married with three children. I enjoy playing golf. I am an avid fitness trainer. I am a great cook. I am a Big Brother. I have opinions about good cigars and bad cigars. I will offer up both in this and future reports. Like my predecessor’s creed, I believe that brutal honesty is vital in winning a reader’s trust.
All hail the Katman. Call me Kittenman. Daniel Pérez for short.
![]()
Discover more from Cigar Reviews by the Katman
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Categories: CIGAR REVIEWS
First, thanks for taking over the spot; not that I’d have grabbed an overpriced Zino anyway, but yer review reinforces my prejudicial opinion.
Like other commenters, I too miss and am concerned about my old friend. Hope he endures! and we get some info from somewhere sometime.
Dave
LikeLike
Thank you, brother.
Sometimes it is more important for a cigar to look cool than be substantive in nature.
While I have been trusted to review cigars, it is not in my purview to release personal information. I am sorry.
-Daniel
LikeLike
Oh, I get that rtl, and of course that’s appropriate. I was thinking more of his fam posting, whenever.
Keep on brother. DH
LikeLike
What makes you think anyone owes you an explanation, especially on someone’s medical condition?
This gentleman, Daniel, is doing his best to continue Phil’s legacy and curate his many reviews. No one owes you jack sh!t. Have a little grace, brother.
LikeLike
So Phil’s images and branding is GONE from the site. Whomever this new guy is won’t COMMENT ON WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON. If Phil passed then tell us. Stop jerking us around. Don’t call me brother.
LikeLike
What makes you think anyone owes you an explanation, especially on someone’s medical condition?
This gentleman, Daniel, is doing his best to continue Phil’s legacy and curate his many reviews. No one owes you jack sh!t. Have a little grace, brother.
LikeLike
What happened to Katman?
LikeLike
My apologies. I haven’t been on the site for a bit. Where’s Phil? I hope he’s OK. Please let me know how my lansman from another bubbe is!
LikeLike
Daniel, I hope you have hands fast enough to have shoplifted that $56.00 cigar. If not, you must have told your wife that it came as a gift. I realize that this is a first review, but if I may make a suggestion, review cigars that the majority of your readers will be able to reasonably purchase. Had you waxed poetic about the greatness of the cigar, how many readers do you think would run to their local cigar shop to buy it? Maybe, a couple, likely not. Phil took a lot of heat for requesting cigars to review. I have no problem with folks sending you tonnage of smokes to review, but please include a citation, “This cigar was sent to me by Daniel in Florida.” Until Phil noted his source, I’m quite certain that his critics thought he got them gratis from the brand owner. Have fun reviewing and once you get rolling, invite some readers to review a current favorite or recent expensive shytestick.
Rob Stevens
LikeLike
I bought all three cigars from a local B&M. They were not gifted to me.
Point taken about the course of my choices for reviewing.
This was my first review. I will work hard at finding a voice that is approachable to the vast number of Katman’s readers.
Katman told me he paid for 75% of the cigars he reviewed. The other 25% was gifted. The great thing about Phil was that he didn’t care what critics thought. This came across loud and clear in his reviews.
This is going to be a joy ride for me. In this climate of manufacturers bombarding the smoking public with new cigars weekly, choices will be mostly random. Much like every other reviewer.
Thank you for your comment.
-Daniel
LikeLike
Daniel,
Congratulations on your first review on this blog. While your writing style is a bit different, you have captured the essence of what made Phil’s reviews so valuable. I think you will be a very worth successor.
I’m fairly new to cigars, but have found the Davidoff/Zino cigars mediocre and grossly overpriced.
Looking forward to your next review.
Jeff
LikeLike
Your comment touches me, brother.
To speak my name alongside the Katman’s is a beautiful thing.
I will do my best to be worthy.
-Daniel
LikeLike
Nice to see this space active again. Hello from MN, and best wishes
LikeLike
Many thanks, brother.
-Daniel
LikeLike
Wow! I woulda been hella mad to have spent that kinda money on a crappy cigar. Looking forward to more reviews. Hoping The Katman is getting along ok.
LikeLike
Thank you for your comment.
-Daniel
LikeLike
Daniel: I enjoyed your well written review, and look forward to the next. On principal alone, It gladdens my heart to know a $56 cigar blows.
Like everone else, I hope Phil is well. If though he is not, and is dealing with health issues, may those issues be resolved swiftly and completely.
Ron
LikeLike
Thank you, brother.
-Daniel
LikeLike
Where is Phil? Is he OK? Did you buy his site? What about the Katman discounts at his sponsors?
LikeLike
I checked and the promo codes are still active.
LikeLike
I’m always interested in ideas about getting cigars ready to smoke. You mention that you are proponent of dry boxing. I too live in a humid climate. can you tell me more about your dry boxing procedure(s)?
Thanks for your time and I look forward to more of your reviews.
LikeLike
It’s pretty simple. Take any empty cigar box and keep your cigars in it for 1-3 days.
A cedar lined box is preferrable.
Make sure you check on your cigar’s condition daily. You don’t want them to dry out.
A reader of Phil’s suggested using small silica packets for bloated cigars you want to bring back to life.
I ruined several cigars this way. They dried out too quickly. But if you use them over the period of a single day, they work perfectly. Experiment. Dry box your inexpensive cigars before you try this, so you don’t offer up good sticks to the cigar gods. Good luck.
Thanks for your comment.
-Daniel
LikeLike
Congratulations on your successful debut. Keep up the good work
LikeLike
Thank you, brother.
-Daniel
LikeLike
Well, dang…sorry the Katman has moved on (?) I will sorely miss his fantastic and entertaining reviews. Good luck, Daniel…you have some mighty big shoes to fill. And, I did enjoy your first review.
LikeLike
Thank you, brother.
I took this opportunity with serious trepidation. No one knows better than I how treacherous this journey will be.
As a longtime reader, the Katman’s level of honesty mixed with a staggering entertainment value scared the hell out of me.
My job, as honored curator, is to keep thousands of Phil’s reviews intact for perpetuity. My reviews are secondary to this important task. I am aware that many of the Katman’s reviews are read over and over as they give many people a smile, and maybe a chuckle, in their difficult day.
I will do the very best I can to not dishonor the brilliant legacy of the Katman.
-Daniel
LikeLike
Glad to see the feed back in action. We’ve clearly all missed the Katman’s reviews. I appreciate the past decade plus of this site and it’s legacy: I’d never haved smoked an Isabela Time Traveller or gifted several PerfecDraw tools if it weren’t for him!
Thanks for the honest review of a hyped piece of mediocrity. Now get yourself in gear and review a couple of damn near perfect Casdaglis and we’ll know you’ve completed the Phil Kohn mind meld!
LikeLike
Thank you, brother.
I too would not have seen daylight of many blends if not for the Katman.
I too am an avid fan of the PerfecSmoke line of cigar accessories.
I checked and Phil reviewed every available cigar from Casdagli. When new blends are released, I will be on it.
P.S. I have several new cigars lined up for review that are in the affordable range. Reviewing out of reach cigars for most smokers’ budgets will only happen on rare occasions from now on.
-Daniel
LikeLike
I’ve had this cigar on several different occasions/instances/circumstances (aged, new out of the tube,etc.) and I thought you were being generous with the Final score of 74. Way overpriced stick… Hope the Katman is well. You have big shoes to fill.
LikeLike
Thank you, Miguel.
Phil is alive and well.
I am not his successor, nor will I ever consider myself as such. I’m merely bringing continuity and light to his body of work.
There will be guest reviewers in the near future. Gentlemen picked by Phil.
I don’t know if Phil will ever return. He is asking for privacy.
While this may not cover all the issues everyone would like resolved, I’m doing the best I can under the circumstances.
-Daniel
LikeLike